![]() When a therapist determines, or pursuant to the standards of his profession should determine, that his patient presents a serious danger of violence to another, he incurs an obligation to use reasonable care to protect the intended victim against such danger. Walcott, Cerundolo, and Beck (2001) cite the second Tarasoff case, establishing a duty to protect. Tarasoff’s family sued the campus police and the university health service for negligence. After Tarasoff returned from a summer in Brazil, Poddar murdered Tatiana with a knife. The police only warned Poddar to stay away from Tarasoff. ![]() Although the psychotherapist did not directly warn Tarasoff or the family, the psychologist notified the police, who interviewed Poddar for commitment. Poddar stated to the university health science psychologist that he intended to kill an unnamed woman, who was identified as Tatiana Tarasoff. Prosenjit Poddar and Tatiana Tarasoff were students at UC Berkeley. Walcott, Cerundolo, and Beck (2001) describe the facts of the Tarasoff case. Duty to warn and duty to protect have ethical implications for all social workers. This area needs to be explored and understood by social work practitioners, educators, and social work students. ![]() Being able to protect potential victims from harm and protecting clients from self-harm have become ethical obligations in social work practice. Since the Tarasoff case in 1974, duty to warn and duty to protect have become important as concepts in the field of social work and other helping disciplines. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |